Thursday, October 25, 2018
The Constitution And Corporations
What Citizens United is About Podcast
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1co7bMQplwQ
1:37 to 8:40
Intro to Citizens United: You Tube
Wednesday, October 24, 2018
Citizens United v. Fedl Election Commn.
Oral Argument here:
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2008/08-205
Opinion read orally by Justice Kennedy here:
https://apps.oyez.org/player/#/roberts4/opinion_announcement_audio/23476
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood
Bluman v. Federal Election Commission Bluman v. Federal Election Com'n.,
800 F. Supp. 2d 281 (D.D.C. 2011)
KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judge; URBINA, District Judge; and COLLYER, District Judge.
Issue: Whether Congress violates the First Amendment by making it a crime for individuals who lawfully reside in the United States, but are neither U.S. citizens nor “permanent residents” under the immigration laws, to make independent expenditures or campaign contributions in connection with any federal, state, or local election; or whether, as the district court held, the ban satisfies strict scrutiny as a “piecemeal” attempt to reduce the “influence” on “how voters will cast their ballots” of aliens whom Congress may suspect of lacking “primary loyalty” to the nation.
We grant the FEC's motion to dismiss, and we deny plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.Kavanaugh, J
In the Supreme Court: Judgment: Affirmed on January 9, 2012.
Alaska decision here:
https://equalcitizens.us/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Superior-Court-decision_to-post.pdf
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2008/08-205
Opinion read orally by Justice Kennedy here:
https://apps.oyez.org/player/#/roberts4/opinion_announcement_audio/23476
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood
Bluman v. Federal Election Commission Bluman v. Federal Election Com'n.,
800 F. Supp. 2d 281 (D.D.C. 2011)
KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judge; URBINA, District Judge; and COLLYER, District Judge.
Issue: Whether Congress violates the First Amendment by making it a crime for individuals who lawfully reside in the United States, but are neither U.S. citizens nor “permanent residents” under the immigration laws, to make independent expenditures or campaign contributions in connection with any federal, state, or local election; or whether, as the district court held, the ban satisfies strict scrutiny as a “piecemeal” attempt to reduce the “influence” on “how voters will cast their ballots” of aliens whom Congress may suspect of lacking “primary loyalty” to the nation.
We grant the FEC's motion to dismiss, and we deny plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.Kavanaugh, J
In the Supreme Court: Judgment: Affirmed on January 9, 2012.
Alaska decision here:
https://equalcitizens.us/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Superior-Court-decision_to-post.pdf
Thursday, October 11, 2018
Can A Sitting President Be Indicted?
https://www.npr.org/2018/08/22/641005331/can-the-sitting-president-of-the-united-states-be-indicted
Wednesday, October 10, 2018
Monday, October 8, 2018
Saturday, October 6, 2018
Debate: Future of the Supreme Court
https://constitutioncenter.org/debate/podcasts/senators-flake-and-coons-the-future-of-the-senate-and-supreme-court
http://dcs.megaphone.fm/PPY7155895631.mp3?key=50624cd4dbd361b5975b430bd1eb803f
http://dcs.megaphone.fm/PPY7155895631.mp3?key=50624cd4dbd361b5975b430bd1eb803f
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Religion and The Supreme Court in The 21st Century
COARSE DESCRIPTION " Religion and the Supreme Court in the 21st Century: Threat o...
-
COARSE DESCRIPTION " Religion and the Supreme Court in the 21st Century: Threat o...
-
The pleading: https://agportal-s3bucket.s3.amazonaws.com/01_Complaint.pdf The injunction: https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/...